[原创]鋼之鍊金術師與現代科學|『动漫主题讨论区』

aaabbbccc

级别: 圣骑士

注册时间:: 2002-05-01

在线时间:: 4小时

发帖:: 2174

只看该作者 255楼发表于: 2006-01-16

引用
最初由 icewater 发布

faint! I just said "So how can you say lead has density??!!" How can you blame me on that?

I worship you, boss of no-density cult!

there's no such fundamental property called density in physics. it's defined as "matter in the volume"/volume. and by that, u do should learn from me. want some concrete result, then go measure ur lead on a neuron star.

BTW, my english probably is a lot better than urs. try ur correct version on some foreigners, see if they understand or not.

回复引用

举报顶端

icewater

级别: 侠客

注册时间:: 2002-12-17

在线时间:: 0小时

发帖:: 501

只看该作者 256楼发表于: 2006-01-17

引用
最初由 aaabbbccc 发布

there's no such fundamental property called density in physics. it's defined as "matter in the volume"/volume. and by that, u do should learn from me. want some concrete result, then go measure ur lead on a neuron star.

WOW, master, what is a neuron star? A star of cells?
And does lead exist in "neuron star" (or neutron star, whatever)?

Master, how can you say density is defined as "matter in the volume"/volume without knowing it's internal structure? It is not only no such fundamental property called density in physics, actually, there's no property called density at all!!

Universal

回复引用

举报顶端

icewater

级别: 侠客

注册时间:: 2002-12-17

在线时间:: 0小时

发帖:: 501

只看该作者 257楼发表于: 2006-01-17

This is not funny. Here're two books for our master.

Astronomy: A Physical Perspective (Cambridge 2003), please read section 8.4.1

and...

Foundations of Modern Cosmology (Oxford 1998), read pp 240.

Universal

回复引用

举报顶端

oscarpotter

级别: 新手上路

注册时间:: 2003-12-28

在线时间:: 0小时

发帖:: 286

只看该作者 258楼发表于: 2006-01-17

支持一下mcv

飘走～

回复引用

举报顶端

aaabbbccc

级别: 圣骑士

注册时间:: 2002-05-01

在线时间:: 4小时

发帖:: 2174

只看该作者 259楼发表于: 2006-01-17

引用
最初由 icewater 发布

WOW, master, what is a neuron star? A star of cells?
And does lead exist in "neuron star" (or neutron star, whatever)?

Master, how can you say density is defined as "matter in the volume"/volume without knowing it's internal structure? It is not only no such fundamental property called density in physics, actually, there's no property called density at all!!

http://www.answers.com/density&r=67

the definition of word "density".